Book Report On I,Tituba, Black Witch of Salem
Book report on I,Tituba, Black Witch of Salem
Witchcraft has remained as a subject of huge commentary in history of mankind. It has formed a major scope of literature and film industry where gothic themes have received varying exploration by artists. Such is the novel I, Tituba, Black Witch of Salem and its play adaptation The Crucible. The two explore on the complex themes that surround witchcraft. This paper seeks to compare and contrast the two pieces of art. Both literatures focus on the story of Salem in Massachusetts relating to Tituba use of spirits to heal the sick. The two literatures also show how the black community is associated with evil and how racism affects the interaction of people in a community.
Both the book and the play share a common plot and common setting. I, Tituba, Black Witch of Salem is an entertainment novel that explores on a true story of West Indian slave, Tituba, who is accused of witchcraft in Salem. The book depicts her as a heroine and a legendary who has learnt a lot of sorcery and magic rituals of obeah to a point of healing the owners’ family members that she belonged to. Her mother was executed and she was raised by an old woman who taught her the art of healing and communicating with spirits. Her powers to heal are interpreted by puritans as witchcraft and her black skin as evil. She was arrested in Salem, Massachusetts and sent to jail but was freed later. The book shows hypocrisy, racial injustice and feminism in the society (Adams 124). In the play, Arthur Miller tells the story of Salem witch trials. The Crucible depicts what happens in a family after they got sick to unknown disease. After taking the child to forest and healing her, Tituba is accused of witch craft and where she is sent to prison. Additionally, the two pieces of art use the same characters and are seen to represent the real story of Tituba who was sold as a slave (Condé 94).
The two pieces of art also explores common themes. They have the same content referring to the ancient use of witchcraft, spirits and how the community perceived it. They show the hypocrisy of the community on issues relating to witchcraft and how members of the Salem community depict the community sanctity. Additionally, the two literatures explore the theme of consulting spirits to heal diseases and infirmity. It is through consulting the spirit that Tituba heals the master family. This aspect highlights the significance of women in the society, an aspect that is also explored in the book. The Salem witch trials in the ply also outline the place of women in the society in the 20th century and before. They were regarded as inferior and occupied the lowest place in the community. The play shows how their opinion was not regarded important in that Tituba cannot defend herself before the tribunal.
Despite their similarities, the two literatures are different in terms of how they represent the story about Tituba. The two representation of the same literature uses different medium. The play concentrates on the trials of Tituba in the court proceeding. Unlike the book, the film does not cover other events that led to the court proceedings and what happened later in deeper content. It does not highlight the underlying aspect in the trial.
In the film, Tituba is associated with the healing of the master’s family by seeking supernatural powers. This is against the culture as women and servant held low positions in the society. Unlike in the film, the trials in the book are based on the issues raised from the beginning of the book. There is a controversy in the society surrounding the right use of spirits and the difference between witchcraft and use of dead spirits.
In conclusion, the novel I, Tituba, Black Witch of Salem and its play adaptation, The Crucible explore on the complex themes of place of women and African Americans in the society. Both the book and the play adopt a common plot to highlight how Tituba’s powers are confused as black magic because of the flawed perception of Blacks and chauvinistic feelings of the society. Nevertheless, the two pieces are different in that they focus on different perspectives. The play only focuses on the events that take place during the trail.